requestId:6852da1b9971c4.52820705.
Certify the true teaching of morality with the “Sage Personality”
——Read the Thoughts of Engelhart’s Two Life Ethics Theory” by Fan Ruiping
Author: Qi Jing
Source: Author Author Authorized Confucian Network Release
Time: February 23, 2023
RuipingruPreparing love affairsMeeting:
My brother, who memorized the article of Master Engelhart, was very grateful to Master Engelhart for his learning and behavior. Especially when Master Engelhart came to Qufu to see the destruction of the Cultural Revolution in the Cultural Revolution, he could not be sad for the human civilization like Enshi! Looking at China today, if I remember the destruction of the saints that year, I don’t know how many people could cry like the Enshi!
As for Enshi’s learning, what makes me most consistent with my heart is that the sense of emotion cannot be able to prove the true nature and correct nature of morality, that is, the sense of emotion cannot be able to solve the problem of why it is correct morality. Enshi went on to emphasize that his moral incompatibility could not be defeated and forced others to change their moral concepts and resolved it through force. I am also indifferent to this. But Enshi believes that as long as he solves the incompatibility of morality through reasoning and convincing methods, I have something to say. In society, people with different moral character believe that the virtues they hold are good, but the virtues they hold can be good or bad. That is, people with different moral character are equally emotional individuals, and have the intention of independence and judges of their own virtues. Therefore, people with different moral character believe that the virtues they hold are true, and regardless of the virtues they hold can improve their virtues. In this case, if you do not have external force to educate and rely solely on the same theory and speech, you will never be able to resolve the differences in morality. Why? Because people with different moral character have their own set of “reasons” that are correct based on logical self-certification, they can only “talk” their own “reasons” to convince others, but they cannot make others “talk” other people’s “reasons” to convince themselves. Since this is the society that “everyone is self-righteous”, there can only be one person, ten people, and hundreds of people, and hundreds of people, and finally there is no meaning. Therefore, this society will not only lead to the morality of relative morality, but will eventually be filled with the morality of no morality. Looking at the east of today, it is influenced by the self-reliance of morality and self-conscientious thinking of the later generations, and the pluralism of value that is not bound by the constrained qualities lead to the relative morality and the expression of each other. It has led to the widespread moral conflicts in society and its value. This is the proof of the proof of the love affairs. Therefore, Leo Sterace hasThis was apology and wanted to return to the political and management nature of Greece to counter it. En hopes to solve the moral differences by reasoning and convincing methods. 彩彩 There is actually the presence of the oriental modern career and the landscape of civilization. Although it is intended to maintain people’s self-reliance and respect and integrity, it is still Kant’s way of reincarnation, that is, it still inherits the modern remnants of Meng and is between Habermas and Habermas in Kunji.
Confucianism is not. Confucianism opposes the use of sensibility to resolve moral dissonance. Because of moral touch and emotion, the so-called “benevolence” of female college students is a heart of love and obsession, which is what Yangming calls “https://sites.google.com/view/sugardaddy-coding/”>一生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生天票生� This sentiment cannot prove the true virtue and truth, and Confucianism is the same as the Enshi family. However, since the sentiment cannot prove the truth of morality, Enshi then gave up the truth of morality. He accused that morality is inconsistent and there is no way to resolve it. He also believed that there is no channel for human virtue to be determined, so human virtue cannot be established to form a broad common understanding of social morality. Confucianism differs from this difference. Confucianism believes that although sentiment cannot prove the truth of morality, it does not expect that there is no way to prove the truth of morality. Confucianism believes that the truth of morality is not self-destructive, but respect for the personality of sages. Confucian trusts saints as the incarnation of virtue, and God uses saints as wood to promote human virtues in life. Therefore, the personality of saints is the verification and confirmation of the true nature of nature of virtue and morality. Therefore, the words of saints are the truth of virtue and truth. This is what it means: “Heaven does not give birth to Zhong Ni, and it will be long nights in ancient times.” In this regard, we worship the personality of the saints, which means we trust that the true nature and correct nature of morality are manifested in the personality of the saints. Therefore, based on Confucianism, the true nature and correct nature of morality are manifested in the worship of the personality of the saints, rather than the self-verification of individual sensibility. Buddhism has some “holy words” and uses Buddhist words to prove the true nature and correct nature of Buddhism. Confucianism has the “holy rules” to prove the true nature and correct nature of morality by the personality of sages, and then uses this “holy rules” to prove the universal suitability and authority of morality. This is a social common understanding established by China’s thousands of years of history. The moral integrity established by the social common understanding does not require any sensibility but has natural correctness; this is the case, and the correctness of morality comes from the worship of the sage’s personality, not from the sensual self-certification of self-reliance of individuals. However, according to Kant, JiInclusive price pttIn “Sacred Count” to prove the true nature and correct nature of morality, it is a product that cannot be independent of human beings to use their personal sensibility to become immature in morality. On the contrary, based on Confucianism, based on “Sacred Count” to prove the true nature and correct nature of morality, it is a product that human beings cultivate themselves, appreciate the virtues of virtue, and move towards the quality of morality. Alas! If Enshi is reborn and has a deeper understanding of Confucianism, it will not be easier for me to say!
Therefore, in a society where moral disagreement, Confucianism opposes the use of force to force the transformation of moral disagreement to solve moral disagreement. This Confucianism is the same as the Enshi family. However, Confucianism only opposes the use of “force” to solve moral dissonance, and does not oppose the use of other methods to solve moral dissonance. Because it does not use certain “external force” to solve moral dissonance, it will not be able to form a common understanding of morals that are approachable to the people, and thus will cause moral values to break through society. Nowadays, it is american.
First of all, Confucianism uses a grand social education network to carry out broad moral education on all levels of society, thereby forming a broad social moral consensus, thereby solving social moral dissonance. This broad social education is the connection that Confucius calls “the upper style is the grass and grass is the grass and grass is the grass and grass”. Confucius said: “The virtue of a man is corrected, and the virtue of a gentleman is the grass. The wind on the grass must be sag.” Therefore, Confucius believed that social education is a kind of “force”, which is an “external force” to achieve the common understanding of social morality. This “external force” is the “power of virtue” above. Confucius compared this “power of virtue” to “style”, so the “power of virtue” is a kind of “soft force” like “style”, rather than the violent “force” of Enshi. This kind of moral “softness” can transform the moral concepts of the common people (gentleman) through the internal education and energy of influencing, and encourage the common people to accept the virtues of correct people, that is, “the grass is scattered”, and thus fight against the morality of society inconsistent to achieve the moral common sense of society. Therefore, the moral “softness” formed by this social education network is a grand “softness” that is above the common people. href=”https://twsweetmeet.com/”>Breeding storiesThe authority of this “education” comes from the “righteous virtue” established by the sage, that is, from the “sage education”, so the “education” occupies above the society (“upper style”) and does not relate to the common people (the common people are “low grass”). In this way, the “educati TC:
發佈留言